Key takeaways
- Coal and hydropower dominate in-state generation: 42% and 38% in 2022, with wind at 15%.5
- Montana law requires a commission determination before a utility serves a new retail load of 5 MW or more, and NorthWestern says it will not serve a new large load until the PSC approves both the tariff and the contract.16
- NorthWestern’s March 2026 proposal would put 5–50 MW customers on five-year agreements and loads above 50 MW on 15-year minimum terms with minimum usage.7
- NorthWestern raised its Colstrip ownership to 55% on January 1, 2026, and says the added capacity may support future large-load service.2
- Qualified data centers are Class 17 property taxed at 0.9% of market value, with a $50 million, 25,000-square-foot threshold.3
- Butte and the Billings area host the most visible projects, but a Sabey land deal in Butte terminated in May 2026, so announced megawatts are not a reliable signal.8
01How Montana compares for data center siting
Montana produces far more electricity than its population uses. The state generated about 26.9 million megawatthours in 2024, with coal as its primary energy source.9 In 2022 coal supplied 42% of in-state generation, hydropower 38%, wind 15% and natural gas about 2%.5 That mix, and a cool, dry climate that suits air-side economization for much of the year, is the core of the state’s pitch.
Fig. 1Montana’s in-state generation mix, 2022
- coal
- 42%
- hydropower
- 38%
- wind
- 15%
- natural gas
- ~2%
What Montana lacks is a settled path to serve very large loads. NorthWestern Energy, the state’s largest public utility, has said it plans to serve at least three data centers that could scale up to about 2,250 MW by 2030.1 For a utility of NorthWestern’s size, the question regulators are asking is who carries the cost and risk of new supply and transmission.
Compared with its neighbors, Montana is less mature than North Dakota, where cooperative and investor-owned utilities already serve operating AI campuses, and it has a different tax structure than Wyoming, which relies on a sales tax exemption. For the broader region, see Mountain West site selection.
02NorthWestern Energy and the large-load tariff
NorthWestern serves much of Montana, including the Butte and Billings areas where the most visible projects are proposed, but rural parcels may sit with an electric cooperative or another utility, so confirm the service territory first. The defining rule is statutory. Montana law requires NorthWestern to show the PSC that a large load that buys from the utility will not harm other customers over the long term.1 A coalition complaint filed in November 2025 cites Mont. Code Ann. § 69-8-201(1), which requires a commission determination before a utility serves a retail load of 5 MW or more.10
NorthWestern argued in 2025 that it did not need commission sign-off before serving these customers, a position the commission and consumer groups disputed.110 The utility now says it will not begin serving a new large-load customer until the commission has approved both the applicable tariff and the individual contract.6
NorthWestern filed its large new load tariff with the PSC in March 2026.7 The proposal splits customers into two bands:
Fig. 2NorthWestern’s proposed large-load bands
Mid-size loads
5–50 MW
- Five-year service agreement
- Standard tariff terms
- Less individual commission review
Largest loads
Above 50 MW
- 15-year minimum contract term
- Usage may not fall below a set level
- PSC must approve each agreement
For a developer, the practical effect is that service to a large campus in NorthWestern territory runs through a public proceeding, a long take-or-pay style commitment and likely collateral. Our guide to large-load tariffs and electric service agreements explains how minimum bills and terms usually work, and the large-load interconnection process covers the studies behind them.
03Interveners, complaints and the 2027 legislative session
The tariff case has drawn wide interest. Governor Gianforte’s administration, through the Department of Environmental Quality, moved to intervene, noting that the Major Facilities Siting Act gives it authority over certain large energy projects, including transmission triggered by large loads.11 Butte-Silver Bow urged the commission to help prevent “boom-bust” fallout and to protect existing customers.11
Consumer and environmental groups are pressing for more. A coalition represented by Earthjustice filed a complaint in late 2025 contending that NorthWestern’s data center supply practices are unreasonable and contrary to Montana law.10 In July 2026 a coalition asked the commission to regulate data centers as a separate class, arguing that loads of 5 to 49 MW would otherwise avoid public scrutiny and review for adverse impacts.12
Fig. 3Path to large-load service from NorthWestern
- 01
Load request
Site, peak MW and ramp; 5 MW or more triggers review.
- 02
Harm review
Utility must show no long-term harm to other customers.
- 03
Tariff approval
PSC rules on the large new load tariff.
- 04
Contract approval
PSC reviews the individual agreement.
- 05
Service
Facilities built under the approved terms.
The legislature is likely to set more rules. In September 2026 an interim committee unanimously advanced a draft bill for the 2027 session that would apply to new retail customers of at least 5 MW, direct the PSC to create a separate large-load class, prevent cost shifting and require financial security, including if the customer stops operating.4 NorthWestern said it was not opposed to the protections but called some language unrealistic.4 Plan for terms to tighten rather than loosen. For how this pattern is playing out nationally, see community engagement for data centers.
04Colstrip and where the power would come from
Colstrip, the coal plant in southeastern Montana, is central to NorthWestern’s supply story. On January 1, 2026, the utility closed its acquisitions of the Avista and Puget Sound Energy interests, raising its ownership to 55%, for no purchase price.2 It holds the 370 MW Puget interest in a FERC-regulated subsidiary to keep those costs separate from Montana retail customers, has contracted to sell that capacity from January 2026 through late 2027, and says the resource may support future service to large-load customers.2
For a site buyer, that means the power for a Montana campus may be coal-backed for years, and its long-term cost will depend on how Colstrip’s operating, environmental and eventual retirement costs are allocated. Buyers with clean-energy goals should plan on bringing their own resources or contracts, and should read renewable energy procurement and siting before relying on the utility mix.
05Butte, Billings and what the projects show
Butte is the most visible market. The Butte-Silver Bow council approved the sale of 606 acres in its industrial park for a potentially large data center.13 Sabey planned power starting at 50 MW in 2027 under a non-binding letter of intent with NorthWestern, with an option to grow to 250 MW or more by 2029.14 A June 2026 legislative staff briefing reported that the buy-sell agreement terminated on May 13, 2026, though Sabey remained interested in the area.8 The same briefing describes Atlas Power’s existing Butte load as cryptocurrency mining with an unclear future use.8
Near Billings, Quantica Infrastructure’s proposed campus at Broadview shows a different model: a large campus paired with gas-fired generation, in an area of Yellowstone County without zoning.15 The lack of zoning simplifies entitlement but leaves water, air permits and transmission as the real gates.15 Our guides to onsite generation and natural gas and bitcoin mining sites converted to AI cover both patterns.
06Cool climate, water and the Class 17 property tax
Montana’s climate is a genuine advantage for air-side economization, but water is where local reception is most fragile. In Butte, the Sabey proposal looked to the Butte-Silver Bow government for cooling water from the Silver Lake Water System, which serves industry and also maintains in-stream fishery flows.15 Quantica has listed zero-water air cooling, deep aquifer wells, treated greywater and direct-to-chip liquid systems as options, with the final choice depending on environmental review and customer needs.15 A closed-loop or air-cooled design is often the easier path; see closed-loop and waterless cooling and water rights and groundwater.
Montana’s data center incentive works through the property tax code. Qualified data centers are Class 17 property with a taxable valuation rate of 0.9% of market value.3 To qualify, a facility needs at least 25,000 square feet of new or expanded space and at least $50 million invested in land, improvements, personal property and software within 48 months, with construction starting after January 1, 2019.3 In 2025 the legislature passed House Bill 424, which revised what counts as Class 17 property, extended the construction timeframe and revised ownership requirements.16
| Item | Requirement or rate |
|---|---|
| Taxable valuation rate | 0.9% of market value |
| Minimum new or expanded area | 25,000 square feet |
| Minimum investment | $50 million within 48 months |
| Construction start | After January 1, 2019 |
Confirm qualification and any later amendments with the Department of Revenue and a tax advisor. Our property taxes on data center projects guide explains how a classification rate translates into a tax bill.
07How to screen a Montana site
- 01Confirm the serving utility and the nearest transmission substation, and whether the parcel is NorthWestern, cooperative or other territory.
- 02Size the load against the 5 MW and 50 MW thresholds, since each changes the contract term and level of commission review.17
- 03Follow the PSC tariff docket and the 2027 legislative draft, and model longer terms, minimum usage and collateral.74
- 04Ask where the supply comes from (Colstrip, market purchases or new resources) and how cost allocation is proposed.2
- 05Confirm water source and rights early, or design for low-water cooling.15
- 06Test Class 17 eligibility and county zoning, including whether the area has zoning at all.315
The site due diligence checklist covers general items, and our methodology explains how we weigh power timing against other factors. If you hold or are evaluating land in Montana, you can get a site reviewed.
Common questions
Does Montana have a data center tax incentive?
Yes, through property tax. Qualified data centers are Class 17 property taxed at 0.9% of market value if they add at least 25,000 square feet and invest at least $50 million within 48 months.3 House Bill 424 revised the class in 2025.16
Does NorthWestern Energy have a data center tariff?
It proposed one in March 2026, with five-year agreements for 5–50 MW customers and 15-year minimum terms for loads above 50 MW.7 The case was still pending as of September 2026,4 and the utility says it will not serve a new large load until the PSC approves both the tariff and the contract.6
Why does 5 MW matter in Montana?
State law requires a commission determination before a utility serves a new retail load of 5 MW or more, and the utility must show the load will not harm other customers over the long term.101
Where would the power for Montana data centers come from?
In part from Colstrip, where NorthWestern raised its share to 55% on January 1, 2026 and says the added capacity may support large-load service.2 New gas generation is also proposed, as at Quantica’s Broadview site near Billings.15
Is Montana good for data center cooling?
The cool, dry climate suits outside-air cooling for much of the year, which reduces cooling energy. Water is the sensitive part: proposals in Butte and near Billings have drawn questions about supply and rights, so many developers are considering air or closed-loop designs.15
Notes
- 1.Utility Dive, “NorthWestern plans ‘large load’ tariff for Montana data centers,” 2025. utilitydive.com
- 2.NorthWestern Energy Group, Inc., “Form 8-K, Exhibit 99.1: Second Quarter 2026 Financial Results,” 2026. sec.gov
- 3.Montana Department of Revenue, “Qualified Data Center Application,” n.d. revenue.mt.gov
- 4.Daily Montanan, “Lawmakers don’t want ratepayers saddled with data center costs,” 2026. dailymontanan.com
- 5.U.S. Energy Information Administration, “Montana Quick Facts,” n.d. eia.doe.gov
- 6.Montana Free Press, “Who wants to weigh in on rates for the data centers Montana’s largest utility is courting?,” 2026. montanafreepress.org
- 7.Daily Montanan, “NorthWestern Energy files data center tariff proposal,” 2026. dailymontanan.com
- 8.Montana Legislative Fiscal Division, “Data Centers 101 (LEGDays, June 2026),” 2026. static.legmt.gov
- 9.U.S. Energy Information Administration, “Montana Electricity Profile 2024,” n.d. eia.gov
- 10.Daily Montanan, “UPDATED: Complaint calls for investigation of NorthWestern Energy’s conduct with data centers,” 2025. dailymontanan.com
- 11.Daily Montanan, “High interest in data center discussion at Public Service Commission,” 2026. dailymontanan.com
- 12.Daily Montanan, “Data centers should be regulated separately by the PSC, coalition argues,” 2026. dailymontanan.com
- 13.KULR-8, “UPDATED: B-SB council OKs 606-acre land sale for potentially huge Butte data center,” 2025. kulr8.com
- 14.Baxtel, “Sabey: Butte, Montana,” n.d. baxtel.com
- 15.Montana Free Press, “As AI investors eye Montana for new data centers, communities brace for water impacts,” 2026. montanafreepress.org
- 16.Montana Legislature, “House Bill 424 (2025), enrolled text,” 2025. archive.legmt.gov
Have a site in mind?
Get a straight answer on your land.
Send a parcel number, an address, a map pin or a target load. We’ll tell you what it can support and what it would take.
This guide is general information about data center site selection. It is not engineering, legal, tax or investment advice. Requirements vary by state, utility and county, so confirm the specifics for any site with the relevant authorities and advisors.
Related guides
More in Site selection by state
- Data Center Site Selection in Texas: Grids, SB 6, Water and Incentives
- Data Center Site Selection in Virginia: Power, GS-5, Zoning and Tax Rules
- Data Center Site Selection in Georgia: Georgia Power, PSC Rules, Water and Taxes
- Data Center Site Selection in Arizona: APS, SRP, TEP, Water and Heat
- Data Center Site Selection in Ohio: AEP Ohio’s Tariff, PJM Costs and the Tax Pause
- Data Center Site Selection in Illinois: ComEd, Ameren, PJM vs. MISO and the Incentive Pause
- Data Center Site Selection in Nevada: NV Energy, Reno and Las Vegas, Water Rules and GOED Abatements
- Data Center Site Selection in Oregon
- Data Center Site Selection in Iowa
- Data Center Site Selection in North Carolina
- Data Center Site Selection in South Carolina
- Data Center Site Selection in Pennsylvania
- Data Center Site Selection in Indiana
- Data Center Site Selection in Wisconsin
- Data Center Site Selection in Minnesota
- Data Center Site Selection in Nebraska
- Data Center Site Selection in Oklahoma
- Data Center Site Selection in Utah
- Data Center Site Selection in Washington State
- Data Center Site Selection in Louisiana
- Data Center Site Selection in Mississippi
- Data Center Site Selection in Alabama
- Data Center Site Selection in Tennessee
- Data Center Site Selection in Kentucky
- Data Center Site Selection in Missouri
- Data Center Site Selection in Kansas
- Data Center Site Selection in New Mexico
- Data Center Site Selection in New York: NYISO, Hydropower and the 2026 Permit Pause
- Data Center Site Selection in Michigan: DTE, Consumers, Tax Rules and Water
- Data Center Site Selection in Arkansas: Entergy, SWEPCO, 2025 Laws and Local Rules
- Data Center Site Selection in Colorado: Xcel’s Large-Load Tariff, Water and Local Rules
- Data Center Site Selection in West Virginia
- Data Center Site Selection in Maryland
- Data Center Site Selection in South Dakota
- Data Center Site Selection in Florida
